NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Austin Bay :: Townhall.com Columnist
Limited Options in Burma
by Austin Bay
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed US Government bailout bill to control the unfolding global financial crisis?




How many people have died in Burma (Myanmar) since Cyclone Zargis struck the South Asian nation on May 3? Last Tuesday, Burma's dictatorship officially put the death toll at 34,000, with another 30,000 missing. The United Nations estimated 60,000 dead. Western governments and media argued 100,000 dead might be a better figure, once the statisticians account for casualties caused by disease and displacement.

Add "delay" to the disease and displacement -- in the case of Burma, delay caused by a dictatorship resisting aid efforts (most from Western nations) and emergency supplies.

Burma's regime is pursuing a modified "Darfur strategy," at least the Darfur political strategy as pursued by Sudan's dictatorship in Khartoum. For the last three years, the Sudanese government has been resisting, thwarting, dodging and blocking international relief and peacekeeping efforts in Darfur, carefully relenting -- by an inch or two -- when the public and economic pressure reaches a momentary crescendo.

The Burmese junta knows the script.

Enter U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon. Expressing his frustration and anger at the junta's next-to-nil response to the cyclone disaster, Ban said: "This is not about politics. It is about saving people's lives. There is absolutely no more time to lose."

Correct on saving lives and doing so quickly. As for "not about politics"? Complete baloney. Ban knows it, but he makes a diplomat's gesture to the murderers in hopes of achieving the immediate goal of providing aid to 2 million destitute survivors.

President George W. Bush called the military junta "isolated or callous." He's pulling his punches, too, for the same reason as Ban. "Paranoid, brutal, calculating and callous" is a much more thorough description of dictatorships in general but especially criminal regimes that leverage natural disasters as genocidal weapons.

Terrible examples litter the 20th century. With starvation as the weapon, Stalin's Russia mass murdered Ukrainians in the 1930s. Ethiopia, Somalia and Sudan's various "intra-state" wars are more recent cases. Saddam Hussein's regime created an ecological disaster by desertifying the splendid agricultural marshlands of the lower Euphrates and Tigris Rivers in order to destroy Shia Arab communities. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Austin Bay Austin Bay is author of three novels. His third novel, The Wrong Side of Brightness, was published by Putnam/Jove in June 2003. He has also co-authored four non-fiction books, to include A Quick and Dirty Guide to War: Third Edition (with James Dunnigan, Morrow, 1996).
 
Be the first to read Austin Bay's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Subject: They're Just Too Dark To Warrant Saving.
Invade Burma? Why?

We have learned some lessons from Iraq. Sure the Burmese Junta is a dictatorship, but haven't we heard ad nauseum from Liberals that being a dictatorship is not necessarily a bad thing. The Burmese, like the Iraqi's, might need a strong hand to control them after 46 years of repression. If we removed their authoritarian government, it might result in chaos in the streets. Maybe even a million dead. But haven't we been told that we need to leave Iraq even if it results in 'genocide'? So I guess allowing a million to die is an option.

So far, the dead still number in the tens or hundreds of thousands. That's not even a quarter of the number that we've found in mass graves in Iraq. At least these people weren't killed by execution squads as in Iraq. But we're being excoriated daily, both at home and abroad, for stopping that.

We had no problem abandoning the Vietnamese or Cambodians. We scurried from Somalia as soon as we took casualties. That was a UN sponsored operation. No freelancing there.

When mass murder became daily life in Rwanda we sat on our hands.

We felt bad about it. I'm sure we will feel bad about the Burmese also. Maybe we can have a concert or something. That might make us feel better.

But invasion? We have learned our lesson. America is not going to ride to the rescue anymore.

Well, maybe in the Balkans. But those people are white Europeans, kind of.

Tell the Burmese that we're sorry. They're just too dark. But they can take heart, Hollywood is sure to make a movie about them. That'll have to do

Reply to Akagi (#7)
I presume that Ratnesar placed this on the shoulders of the Indians, the Banglas and the Thais--all of whom have had problems with Burma.

(though that would be evidence that Time is fit only for lining birdcage, cat litter-box or squat-over toilet)
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2: