NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Michael Barone :: Townhall.com Columnist
Why Veeps Now Matter
by Michael Barone
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed US Government bailout bill to control the unfolding global financial crisis?




"Not Exactly a Crime" is the title of a book on America's vice presidents published in 1972 -- a year before Vice President Spiro Agnew was forced to resign for actually committing a crime.

The office of vice president has long been the butt of jokes -- you know the punch lines -- but as we await Barack Obama's and John McCain's choices for vice president, we do so with the knowledge that vice presidents in the last five administrations have been important officers of government. (Yes, including Dan Quayle -- see Bob Woodward and David Broder's book). How the vice presidency has been transformed is an interesting story that takes us from the Founding Fathers to recent history.

The framers of the Constitution created the vice presidency to solve the problem of succession. They expected that electors meeting in state capitals would vote for two candidates from different states, with the No. 2 vote-getter becoming vice president. It worked well twice. Then the unexpected emergence of political parties produced bizarre results.

In 1796, John Adams was elected president and his opponent, Thomas Jefferson, vice president. In 1800, the electors produced a tie between Jefferson and his ticket-mate, Aaron Burr, broken only by an opposition Federalist in the House of Representatives. The Twelfth Amendment promptly passed, providing that electors cast separate votes for president and VP. Parties would nominate one man for each office.

The result, with few exceptions, was the nomination of mediocrities to balance a ticket geographically or ideologically. In 1824 and 1828, the nomination for the dominant Jeffersonian Party was secured by John C. Calhoun, who disagreed bitterly with his two presidents, John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson. After the first Democratic national convention took on the task of picking VP nominees in 1832, Calhoun resigned and returned to the Senate.

For 130 years, only one vice president -- Martin van Buren -- was elected president in his own right without having succeeded to the office first. Republicans re-nominated sitting vice presidents only twice in their first 100 years, until Richard Nixon was re-nominated and re-elected in 1956. One vice president nominated across party lines, Andrew Johnson, was so unpopular as president that he was impeached by the House and missed removal from office by one vote in the Senate.

The problem was that everyone knew vice presidents had little to do. Presiding over the Senate is a clerk's job, and opportunities to break ties there seldom arise. As late as the 1950s, veeps did business from an office in the Capitol and had little occasion to visit the White House.

When Harry Truman was summoned there on April 12, 1945, and told of Franklin Roosevelt's death, he did not know that the president was out of the city -- he had met with him just twice in his 82 days as vice president. After Truman's first Cabinet meeting, Secretary of War Henry Stimson took him aside and told him the government was developing a weapon of enormous power. This was the first time Truman had heard about the atomic bomb.

Truman's unpreparedness may have prompted some later presidents to give vice presidents useful things to do. Dwight Eisenhower sent Richard Nixon on important foreign trips. John Kennedy gave Lyndon Johnson responsibility for the space program. Gerald Ford gave the energetic Nelson Rockefeller some assignments, then dropped him from the ticket.

Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale turned the vice presidency around. Mondale had offices and staffers in the West Wing, regular one-on-one meetings with the president and access to top appointees. Their example has been followed since. And presidential nominees have not waited for the very last minute at the convention to pick their VPs since Ronald Reagan did it in 1980. Potential VPs are vetted closely and with a view to how well they could work with the president. An office that was long the vermiform appendix of American government has become a useful organ.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Barone is a senior writer with U.S. News & World Report and the principal co-author of The Almanac of American Politics, published by National Journal every two years. He is also author of Our Country: The Shaping of America from Roosevelt to Reagan, The New Americans: How the Melting Pot Can Work Again, the just-released Hard America, Soft America: Competition vs. Coddling and the Competition for the Nation's Future.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Michael Barone's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Subject: BETTER A MORMAN FAITH THEN "WRIGHTS"
IF AMERICANS CAN ACCEPT OBAMA WITH HIS PAST RELIGIOUS BACKGROUND, THEY CAN SURELY OVERLOOK MITT ROMNEYS MORMON FAITH, HIS IS A TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE. FOR 20 YEARS, OBAMA SUPPORTED A RAD-ICAL PREACHER AND WORSHIPED ALONG SIDE AN ANTI-WHITE CONGREGATION! WE OBSERVED THE TAPES OF BLACKS HOOTING, JUMPING UP AND DOWN, LAUGHING WHEN RACIAL SLURS WERE MADE ETC,. SAD BUT TRUE.

PC heading for a fall
I'm a little surprised at the over-confidence:

. . . you missed the groundswell of support for Romney as VP? Certainly there are naysayers, but the far and great majority of GOP leaders and commentators are talking Romney up and predicting it. He's winning the polls, as well. " Reply:

Romney won't run on the ticket. He'll campaign; not run. There's no groundswell-- and Why?

Can't win with a Mormon in the southern states. McCain & his handlers know it. A Mormon KILLS the pres candidates.

McCain himself said a couple weeks ago that "no one is representing me better than Romney".

"Indeed, Romney is doing the heavy lifting for McCain."

REPLY: Romney may merit a cabinet post. However, PC--

To elect him to the spot from which he's a heartbeat away from the presidency is simply unrealistic to TOO MANY VOTERS. "Deal killer."


"I think it is a distinct possibility that McCain will choose him. It will please far more conservatives than it will annoy."

Reply: -- For my part I would have to back them. Yet I know it would only be a losing cause. The Democrats are dying to see it go to Romney. They also know it's the kiss of death for our GOP.