NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Friday, April 18, 2008
Patrick J. Buchanan :: Townhall.com Columnist
Who's Behind the Proxy Wars
by Patrick J. Buchanan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed US Government bailout bill to control the unfolding global financial crisis?




Iran is conducting a proxy war against the United States in Iraq, declared Ambassador Ryan Crocker last week.

How? Gen. David Petraeus explained. The Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and Hezbollah are arming, training and directing the Shia militia fighting U.S. and Iraqi forces in Basra and firing rockets into the Green Zone. Said Petraeus, the Quds Force is responsible for killing hundreds of American soldiers.

If true, these are acts of war from a privileged sanctuary. And Bush would be as justified in attacking these Iranian base camps as was Nixon in ordering U.S. forces to clean out the North Vietnamese sanctuaries in Cambodia.

While there is no reason to question the truth of what Petraeus and Crocker allege, this proxy war raises a question. What is Tehran's motive?

Iran, after all, is the principal beneficiary of the U.S. invasion that dethroned its enemy Saddam, ended the Sunni Baath Party's monopoly of power and opened the door to Shia politicians with strong ties to Tehran. The regime in the Green Zone is the same regime that rolled out a red carpet for President Ahmadinejad.

Why, then, would Iran bloody it up? Why, when things are going Iran's way in Iraq, would it risk war with the United States over Iraq?

The April 16 Los Angeles Times offers an answer. Iran's proxy war against us in Iraq may be Tehran's response to a U.S. proxy war being waged against Iran. Ahmadinejad may be exacting blood for blood.

According to Times' writer Borzou Daragahi, Iran believes the United States is behind groups that are systematically killing Iranians along the border.

One such group is the Party for Free Life in Kurdistan, or PEJAK, which is linked to the PKK that has conducted a terrorist war in Turkey and is considered by the United States a terrorist organization. The founder of PEJAK is Osman Ocalan, brother of the founder of the PKK, who is now serving a life sentence in a Turkish prison.

As Turkey retaliates against the PKK with artillery fire and raids into Kurdistan, Iranians are now doing the same.

A second group, regarded by both the United States and Iran as terrorist, is the Mujahedin Khalq, a cult-like group, operating inside Iraq on the Iranian border. Iranians also believe the United States is behind attacks in the oil-rich and Arab Khuzestan region of southwest Iran. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Pat Buchanan is a founding editor of The American Conservative magazine, and the author of many books including State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America .
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Pat Buchanan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Subject: Not taken lightly
I agree we should not take civilian casualties lightly. If we allow one nuke to go off in NYC, for instance, our civilian casualties would be some 10 million people. However, our whole country would go into a deep decline resulting in untold civilian suffering.

Thus, I compare wiping out 40-100 million Iranians and others who threaten the use of nuclear weapons to losing our whole population. To me the choice is obvious. Soft-headed defeatist liberals would agonize until it is too late.


shubi
A lot of the people who would like to condemn the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki wouldn't even be here today if we hadn't. Their parents/grandparents could have been among the estimated 500,000 - 1,000,000 casualties. For my part, although I don't like the idea of escalation that could lead to horror that is equal to or surpasses WWII, at the end of the day we should all be resolved to win, whatever the cost. I just don't believe that any course of action with the possibility of excessive civilian casualties should be undertaken lightly. Not if we truly want to say that we, as a nation, act with noble purpose. On the other hand, to agonize over such things when the gloves truly come off, is to risk defeat. I don't think Curtis LeMay had many sleepless nights. Let us only do what is necessary.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State: